↑ Вгору

Реферат на тему

The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed


читати

Переглянути реферат

зберегти

Скачати реферат

друкувати

Друкувати реферат

A.Pou

ESL67W

“…The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed.”

Article [II.] Amendments to the Constitution

Gun control

America is faced with a growing problem of violence. Streets have become
a battlefield where the people can be beaten for a couple dollars, where
women can be brutally attacked and raped. Every day criminals try to
divide territories to sell their illegal drugs, and innocent people are
caught in the crossfire of drive-by shootings. We cannot ignore the
damage that these criminals are doing to our society, and strong actions
must be taken to stop this from happening. However, the efforts by the
gun control supporters to eliminate the legal ownership of firearms do
not address the real problem, and simply disarm the innocent law-abiding
citizens who might need firearms for self-defense. There are three main
reasons why gun control law should take firearms from hands of
criminals, not law-abiding citizens, first historically legal ownership
of firearms in America, second if Congress passes laws restricting
ownership of firearms, as a result it will affect law-abiding people
only, third statistic shows that the people who go through legal process
of obtaining permits do not want to break the law.

First of all to understand the reasons of the gun control efforts, we
must take a look at the history of America, and the role firearms have
played in it. The second amendment of the Constitution of the United
States makes firearm ownership legal in this country; it says, “… The
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”(1).
Firearms in the new world were used initially for hunting, and for
self-defense. However, when the colonists felt that the burden of
British oppression was too much for them, they picked up their personal
firearms and went to war. The founding fathers of the country understood
that an armed populace aided in fighting off oppression. They made the
right to keep and bear arms a constitutionally guaranteed right. Thomas
Jefferson wrote, “No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms“(2).

Second, today Congress, claiming that they want to take guns out of the
hands of criminals, has worked to pass legislation that would take the
guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens instead. The point is the
efforts of gun control do not address the real problem of crime.
Therefore, if congress passes laws restricting ownership of firearms, as
a result this will affect law-abiding people only. Criminals will
continue to violate these laws, they will continue to carry their
firearms, and they will that commit a crime much easier when they know
that their victims will be unarmed. Unarmed victims will have small
chance against an armed one. In many states, including Florida and
Texas, citizens have stated that they want to keep their right to carry
firearms for self- defense. Since the late 1980's, Florida has been
issuing concealed weapons permits to law-abiding citizens, and these

ens, and these
citizens have been carrying their firearms to defend themselves against
crime. The result is that the rate of violent crime has actually dropped
in contrast to the national average. Previously, Florida had been
leading the nation in this category, and the citizens of that state have
welcomed the change (3).

Third, gun control supporters tried to claim that there would be
bloodshed in the streets when these citizens were given the right to
carry guns. They claimed that the cities of Florida would become the
Wild West city with shootouts on every street corner, and duels over
simple disagreements. These gun control supporters were wrong. More than
200,000 concealed carry permits have been issued so far, with only 36 of
these permits revoked for improper use of a firearm (4). This statistic
shows that the people who go through legal process of obtaining permits
do not want to break the law. The people who do intend to break the law
will carry their guns whether or not the law allows them to do so.
Today, criminals often carry illegal weapons, such as sawed-off
shotguns, machine guns; ignore the current laws that make these weapons
illegal. When they are caught, the courts usually dismiss these weapons
charges; prosecute for the more serious charges, like murder, that are
being committed with the weapons. The gun control supporters say that
the gun is demon itself, rather than deal with the criminals. This is
the main flaw in their argument. The gun control supporters claim that
possession of a gun can turn average citizens into bloodthirsty maniacs.
This theory falls apart under close analysis. If legal possession of a
firearm caused this sort of attitude, then why are crime rates highest
in areas such as New York City and Washington, D.C., which have strict
gun control laws? Why are crimes rates dropping in state such as Florida
where private ownership of firearms is encouraged?

In conclusion, three main reasons why gun control law should take
firearms from hands of criminals, not law-abiding citizens are first
historically legal ownership of firearms in America, second if Congress
passes laws restricting ownership of firearms, as a result it will
affect law-abiding people only, third statistic shows that the people
who go through legal process of obtaining permits do not want to break
the law. Legal ownership of a gun does not cause crime, the same time,
the laws, which make it illegal to own firearms, do little to prevent
criminals from getting guns. These laws only restrict people who respect
the law, the people who would only use firearms for legal purposes.
Criminals have fear that they can be the victims themselves, when people
have the rights to own firearms and defend themselves and their
families. The government must look at the problem of reducing crime in
America realistically, and develop laws that would be effective. Gun
control laws are neither realistic, nor effective in reducing crime.
Therefore, the lawmakers should direct their efforts toward controlling

uld direct their efforts toward controlling
crime, not controlling legal ownership of firearms.

Works Cited

Article [II.] Amendments to the Constitution HYPERLINK
"http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Amend.html"
www.house.gov/Constitution/Amend.html

Florida State Laws. HYPERLINK
"http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Crime_Statistics/index.asp"
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Crime_Statistics/index.asp



Thomas Jefferson. Virginia Constitution. 1776.



Virginia Constitution HYPERLINK
"http://www.harbornet.com/rights/virginia.txt"
http://www.harbornet.com/rights/virginia.txt

PAGE

PAGE 1


© 2013 Alive-inter.net Про сайт Зворотній зв`язок Відмова від відповідальності